Question: 1
Your company recently deployed a new child domain to an Active Directory forest. You discover that a user modified the Default Domain Policy to configure several Windows components in the child domain. A company policy states that the Default Domain Policy must be used only to configure domain-wide security settings. You create a new Group Policy object (GPO) and configure the settings for the Windows components in the new GPO. You need to restore the Default Domain Policy to the default settings from when the domain was first installed. What should you do?
A. From Group Policy Management, click Starter GPOs, and then click Manage Backups.
B. From a command prompt, run the dcgpofix.exe command.
C. From Windows PowerShell, run the Copy-GPO cmdlet.
D. Run ntdsutil.exe to perform a metadata cleanup and a semantic database analysis.
Answer: B
Question: 2
You network contains an Active Directory domain named contoso.com. The domain contains 1,000 desktop computers and 500 laptops. An organizational unit (OU) named OU1 contains the computer accounts for the desktop computers and the laptops. You create a Windows PowerShell script named Script1.ps1 that removes temporary files and cookies. You create a Group Policy object (GPO) named GPO1 and link GPO1 to OU1. You need to run the script once weekly only on the laptops. What should you do?
A. In GPO1, create a File preference that uses item-level targeting.
B. In GPO1, create a Scheduled Tasks preference that uses item-level targeting.
C. In GPO1, configure the File System security policy. Attach a WMI filter to GPO1.
D. In GPO1, add Script1.ps1 as a startup script. Attach a WMI filter to GPO1.
Answer: B
Question: 3
You deploy a new enterprise certification authority (CA) named CA1. You plan to issue certificates based on the User certificate template. You need to ensure that the issued certificates are valid for two years and support autoenrollment. What should you do first?
A. Run the certutil.exe command and specify the resubmit parameter.
B. Duplicate the User certificate template.
C. Add a new certificate template for CA1 to issue.
D. Modify the Request Handling settings for the CA.
Answer: B
Question: 4
Your network contains an enterprise root certification authority (CA) named CA1. Multiple computers on the network successfully enroll for certificates that will expire in one year. The certificates are based on a template named Secure_Computer. The template uses schema version 2. You need to ensure that new certificates based on Secure_Computer are valid for three years. What should you do?
A. Modify the Validity period for the certificate template.
B. Instruct users to request certificates by running the certreq.exe command.
C. Instruct users to request certificates by using the Certificates console.
D. Modify the Validity period for the root CA certificate.
Answer: A
Question: 5
Your network contains an Active Directory forest named contoso.com. The forest contains a single domain. The domain contains a server named Server1. An administrator named Admin01 plans to configure Server1 as a standalone certification authority (CA). You need to identify to which group Admin01 must be a member to configure Server1 as a standalone A. The solution must use the principle of least privilege. To which group should you add Admin01?
A. Administrators on Server1.
B. Domain Admins in contoso.com
C. Cert Publishers on Server1
D. Key Admins in contoso.com
Answer: A
Download Microsoft 70-742 Exam Questions - Free 3 Months Updates - Realexamdumps.com
Thursday, 8 August 2019
Thursday, 21 February 2019
Microsoft MCSA 70-742 Exam Dumps, 70-742 Practice Test Questions | RealExamDumps.com
How do your live events rate? Take the Event Evolution Assessment and find out.
The job description of an event marketer is changing rapidly. It has never been harder to break through the noise out there, to reach your attendees and persuade them to come to your events. Attendees have an increasingly heightened expectation that your event will be relevant and valuable to them personally. They want that to be meaningful, personalized, and highly impactful, and that expectation starts right out of the gate, from how you market your event, how you turn prospects into registrants, and continues through the attendee experience you deliver on site.
And there’s also an internal expectation: proof of impact from events — a return on the 24 percent of a company’s marketing budget that is typically spent on events.
“Why? Because they work,” says Mike Dietrich, Senior Director, Product Marketing for Cvent. “Outside of a company’s website, events are the most effective marketing channel.”
But a quarter of a company’s marketing budget is a hefty investment into face-to-face meetings and events. And the people writing the checks, the senior marketing or business leaders, only deploy capital where it’s going to do the most good, and want to measure the impact of all those places where they put their dollars. They need to do the same for events.
That means you’re asked to be not just a first-rate marketer, but a digital marketer, a technologist, and even a financial analyst who can dig deeply into the numbers and prove ROI.
“Identifying where your organization currently sits and how to improve can be tough,” says Dietrich. “How are you doing compared to your peers? What are others doing that you could do? What does ‘good; look like and how does your organization get there?”
That increasingly requires a map and compass, and event technology has evolved to the point where those tools are readily available to hand – and it’s why Cvent created the “Event Evolution Model” and an accompanying assessment tool.
“As the world’s largest event tech company, we have a front row seat to the trends and changes in the industry,” Dietrich says. “With millions of events every year running through our platform, we have a real good sense of the global community of use out there and how different organizations and different companies are meeting these challenges.”
That’s formed the basis for their model, which is constructed to look at how organizations plan, execute, and measure the impact of their events. It looks at all facets of your event program, from how an event strategy is put together, how that’s planned and executed, and the resources and tools that are available on site. And then long after the event is over, it examines how organizations are using all that data to continually prove impact and improve the next year’s events.
Levels of maturity
Event programs fall into one of four general levels of maturity:
- Emergent
- Elevated
- Evolved
- Expert
Here’s how that translates into the real world.
Emergent meetings and events programs are really in their very foundational stage. What we see here is many of the meetings and events are kind of ad-hoc. They’re planned and executed by whoever is available to do that within the organization – there might not even be an event professional on staff. Success is largely defined as the event happening in the first place. Did people show up? Did they listen to the content? Did they listen to the agenda?
Elevated meetings and event programs typically have a set of professional resources in place, with staff that identify as event professionals. They have processes in place, and they’re probably starting to use technology selectively to help them organize, market, and execute their events. But even in this stage, they probably still have a limited ability to prove overall event value. They typically fall short of the expert and evolved meetings and event programs, because they’re still often unable to prove the impact of their events and be able to tie results directly back to those events and any marketing efforts.
Evolved programs have a very well-defined and rationalized meetings and events strategy. They have specialized resources, often teams of event planners, to be able to execute any number of events typically. They have very strong data and technology foundations, which they use then to leverage the ability to consistently deliver quality events.
But while they have those professional planners, and they’re quite good at capturing data and using data to prove impact and improve year-over-year results, they’re having issues of scale. They’re largely still using data to make decisions only for their marquee events, or maybe the top few events they host during the year.
Expert meetings and events programs are distinguished from those at the evolved level by their ability to manage and leverage their technology and data, to enable them to really achieve excellence at scale. It is one thing to execute an event linearly or sequentially. It’s another thing to be able to attain a level of execution excellence, meeting over meeting, when your event program may constitute hundreds or even in some cases thousands of events per year.
Wednesday, 13 February 2019
Latest Microsoft 70-742 Actual Free Exam Questions | RealExamDumps.com
Constant security improvements to Microsoft products are finally starting to pay off dividends, a Microsoft security engineer revealed last week.
Speaking at the BlueHat security conference in Israel, Microsoft security engineer Matt Miller said that widespread mass exploitation of security flaws against Microsoft users is now uncommon --the exception to the rule, rather than the norm.
Miller credited the company's efforts in improving its products with the addition of security-centric features such as a firewall on-by-default, Protected View in Office products, DEP (Data Execution Prevention), ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization), CFG (Control Flow Guard), app sandboxing, and more.
These new features have made it much harder for mundane cybercrime operations to come up with zero-days or reliable exploits for newly patched Microsoft bugs, reducing the number of vulnerabilities exploited at scale.
Mass, non-discriminatory exploitation does eventually occur, but usually long after Microsoft has delivered a fix, and after companies had enough time to test and deploy patches.
Miller said that when vulnerabilities are exploited, they are usually part of targeted attacks, rather than cybercrime-related mass exploitation attacks.
For example, in 2018, 90 percent of all zero-days affecting Microsoft products were exploited part of targeted attacks. These are zero-days found and used by nation-state cyber-espionage groups against strategic targets, rather than vulnerabilities discovered by spam groups or exploit kit operators.
Futureproofing Your Startup with Cloud-Based Phone Systems
If you’re starting a new business, you’ve likely been planning, saving and preparing for a while. But with limited startup funds, you’ve got to make the most of every investment dollar. That includes not only choosing the right technology from Day...
White Papers provided by Vonage
The other 10 percent of zero-day exploitation attempts weren't cyber-criminals trying to make money, but people playing with non-weaponized proof-of-concept code trying to understand what a yet-to-be-patched vulnerability does.
Microsoft zero-day exploitation
Image: Matt Miller
"It is now uncommon to see a non-zero-day exploit released within 30 days of a patch being available," Miller also added.
Exploits for both zero-day and non-zero-day vulnerabilities usually pop up much later because it's getting trickier and trickier to develop weaponized exploits for vulnerabilities because of all the additional security features that Microsoft has added to Windows and other products.
Two charts in Miller's presentation perfectly illustrate this new state of affairs. The chart on the left shows how Microsoft's efforts into patching security flaws have intensified in recent years, with more and more security bugs receiving fixes (and a CVE identifier).
On the other hand, the chart on the right shows that despite the rising number of known flaws in Microsoft products, fewer and fewer of these vulnerabilities are entering the arsenal of hacking groups and real-world exploitation within the 30 days after a patch.
Microsoft exploitation trends
Image: Matt Miller
This shows that Microsoft's security defenses are doing their job by putting additional hurdles in the path of cybercrime groups.
If a vulnerability is exploited, it is most likely going to be exploited as zero-day by some nation-state threat actor, or as an old security bug for which users and companies have had enough time to patch
Speaking at the BlueHat security conference in Israel, Microsoft security engineer Matt Miller said that widespread mass exploitation of security flaws against Microsoft users is now uncommon --the exception to the rule, rather than the norm.
Miller credited the company's efforts in improving its products with the addition of security-centric features such as a firewall on-by-default, Protected View in Office products, DEP (Data Execution Prevention), ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization), CFG (Control Flow Guard), app sandboxing, and more.
These new features have made it much harder for mundane cybercrime operations to come up with zero-days or reliable exploits for newly patched Microsoft bugs, reducing the number of vulnerabilities exploited at scale.
Mass, non-discriminatory exploitation does eventually occur, but usually long after Microsoft has delivered a fix, and after companies had enough time to test and deploy patches.
Miller said that when vulnerabilities are exploited, they are usually part of targeted attacks, rather than cybercrime-related mass exploitation attacks.
For example, in 2018, 90 percent of all zero-days affecting Microsoft products were exploited part of targeted attacks. These are zero-days found and used by nation-state cyber-espionage groups against strategic targets, rather than vulnerabilities discovered by spam groups or exploit kit operators.
Futureproofing Your Startup with Cloud-Based Phone Systems
If you’re starting a new business, you’ve likely been planning, saving and preparing for a while. But with limited startup funds, you’ve got to make the most of every investment dollar. That includes not only choosing the right technology from Day...
White Papers provided by Vonage
The other 10 percent of zero-day exploitation attempts weren't cyber-criminals trying to make money, but people playing with non-weaponized proof-of-concept code trying to understand what a yet-to-be-patched vulnerability does.
Microsoft zero-day exploitation
Image: Matt Miller
"It is now uncommon to see a non-zero-day exploit released within 30 days of a patch being available," Miller also added.
Exploits for both zero-day and non-zero-day vulnerabilities usually pop up much later because it's getting trickier and trickier to develop weaponized exploits for vulnerabilities because of all the additional security features that Microsoft has added to Windows and other products.
Two charts in Miller's presentation perfectly illustrate this new state of affairs. The chart on the left shows how Microsoft's efforts into patching security flaws have intensified in recent years, with more and more security bugs receiving fixes (and a CVE identifier).
On the other hand, the chart on the right shows that despite the rising number of known flaws in Microsoft products, fewer and fewer of these vulnerabilities are entering the arsenal of hacking groups and real-world exploitation within the 30 days after a patch.
Microsoft exploitation trends
Image: Matt MillerThis shows that Microsoft's security defenses are doing their job by putting additional hurdles in the path of cybercrime groups.
If a vulnerability is exploited, it is most likely going to be exploited as zero-day by some nation-state threat actor, or as an old security bug for which users and companies have had enough time to patch
Tuesday, 5 February 2019
Microsoft 70-742 Exam Dumps, 70-742 Practice Test Questions PDF | Realexamdumps.com
Realexamdummps is offering very reliable 70-742 Test Centres real questions answers. Our key advantages are that
1. We get first-hand information;
2. We provide one –year free updates;
3. We provide one-year customer service;
4. Pass guaranteed;
5. Money back guaranteed
and so on. Purchasing our 070-742 Test Centres real questions answers will share worry-free shopping. If you fail exam with our exam questions, you just need to send your 70-742 Test Centres failure score scanned to our email address, we will full refund to you soon without any other doubt.
1. We get first-hand information;
2. We provide one –year free updates;
3. We provide one-year customer service;
4. Pass guaranteed;
5. Money back guaranteed
and so on. Purchasing our 070-742 Test Centres real questions answers will share worry-free shopping. If you fail exam with our exam questions, you just need to send your 70-742 Test Centres failure score scanned to our email address, we will full refund to you soon without any other doubt.
Thursday, 24 January 2019
Monday, 2 April 2018
Microsoft Issues Update To Fix Flaw In Earlier Meltdown Patch
Security
Researchers Disclosed Two Flaws - "Meltdown" And "Spectre"
-- On January 3 That Affected Nearly Every Modern Computing Device Containing
Chips From Intel, AMD And ARM Holdings.
Security researchers uncovered two vulnerabilities on January 3 - "Meltdown" and "Specter" - which affected almost every modern computing device with chips from Intel, AMD and ARM Holdings. This update resolves an elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Windows kernel in the 64-bit (x64) version of Windows This vulnerability is documented in CVE-2018-1038, "Microsoft said on its support page on Friday.
"Users must apply this update to fully protect against this vulnerability if their computers were updated in January 2018 or after that date by applying one of the following updates," the company added. After chip maker Intel had confirmed a possible security flaw in its chips, Microsoft released emergency updates for compatible versions of Windows in January.
After the bugs became known, major technology vendors such as Microsoft, Google, Apple, and Intel released security updates to protect users from possible data theft.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)